The concept of living
concrete and environmental benefits has been elaborated by Corless. (2020) in
the article “Scientists create living concrete from bacteria and sand”.
Conventional concrete is known to contribute a great amount of carbon dioxide
(CO2) emission to the environment, while living concrete containing bacteria
aids in the reduction of CO2 emission. Researchers from University of Colorado
Boulder mixed components such as sand, hydrogel, and bacteria to create a
living substance with the strength of cement-based mortar and the prospect to
perform photosynthesis. In the process of designing living concrete,
researchers used a 3D sand–hydrogel scaffold containing cyanobacteria.
Cyanobacteria are able to adapt in extreme environmental conditions.
Furthermore, carbon dioxide is converted to sugars during the process of
photosynthesis. Regeneration of cyanobacteria can be obtained from a source,
while achieving the original properties as the source with the extension of
hydrogel scaffold. Creation of living concrete will give rise to advantages to
the environment. However, certain trade-offs will be recognised such as
concrete is only able to obtain its maximum strength when it is dried
completely, it is more costly than conventional concrete, and it is not
suitable to grow in any atmosphere and media.
Firstly,living concrete
has lower compressive strength than conventional concrete. This leads to the
presence of bacteria being compromised during the drying process as it requires
humidity to function. In order to maintain the structure of the concrete,
mixing the bacteria with gelatine is required. In addition, Timmer (2020)
discussed that an ambient humidity of 50% and above is necessary to demonstrate
moisture for the gelatine to absorb adequate water to support the bacterial
life for at least a week. Therefore, maximum strength is not achievable where
bacteria exist in the concrete.
Secondly, an additional
factor to consider would be the cost of living concrete as it is more expensive
in comparison to conventional concrete.With a
combination of biological and chemical properties, living concrete is ahead in
technology advancement as compared to conventional concrete.This leads to more
case studies behind the project. It can be beneficial to the environment, but
on the other hand, high cost production would be a major consideration. With a
cost factor in mind, small medium enterprise and private companies would make
careful considerations when choosing concrete. Hence, there might be
more supply than demand within the industry.
Lastly, the growth of
bacteria is not well supported in the atmosphere. Different types of nutrients
and metabolic products are used to grow calcifying micro-organisms as they can
influence survival, biofilm and crystal formation. Additional work should be
done in the retention and metabolic product of the building material. As
countries have different ambient temperatures, researchers need to conduct
various case studies for individual countries and customise a suitable living
concrete accordingly.
However, a main
advantage of living concrete is being able to heal by itself. All concrete is
known to crack eventually, which is mainly caused by wear and tear. Typically,
if the cracks are not fixed immediately, at times, it will lead to high
permeability where water is able to flow through those cracks. In such cases,
steel reinforcements are stored in the concrete. After a period of time, steel
will corrode, and eventually result in structure collapse. With the invention
of living concrete, it can heal by itself with the use of bacteria as it is
more active in moist conditions. Hence, in the scenario where water flows into
the concrete, bacteria are able to mend the cracks. The article ‘The ‘living
concrete’ that can heal by itself’ by Andrew S. (2016) mentioned that bacteria
and calcium lactate will be mixed into capsules where the capsule will be added
into the wet concrete mix. In the event where cracks occur, water will flow
through it, and the capsules will be open when it gets in contact with water
which will eventually close up the cracks.
In conclusion, further research in living
concrete needs to be done to achieve similar properties as conventional
concrete. Additionally, profits are maximised with high sales and low material
cost. Hence, it is ideal to weigh a balance between cost and the
properties to ensure maximum profits and benefits. In addition, due to the varying ambient temperatures in different
countries, further studies need to be done to ensure uniformity between
temperature and the growth of bacteria to produce a suitable living concrete.
Reference
Corless, V. (2020, January 16). Scientists create living concrete from bacteria and sand. Advanced Science News. https://www.advancedsciencenews.com/scientists-create-living-concrete-from-bacteria-and-sand/
Shantilal Vekariya, M & Pitroda, J. (2013, September 9). International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 4(9).
http://www.ijettjournal.org/volume-4/issue-9/IJETT-V4I9P181.pdf
Stewart, A (2016, March 7). The “living concrete” that can heal itself. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2015/05/14/tech/bioconcrete-delft-jonkers/index.html
Timmer , J. (2020, January 18). "Living concrete" is an interesting first step. Ars Technica. https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/01/living-concrete-is-an-interesting-first-step/
No comments:
Post a Comment